We should have a challenge: 6.5 Creedmoor versus 270 Winchester. Which cartridge dominates the race?
In my continuous mission to focus the light of reality on the “6.5 creedmoor ammo upset,” I’ve chosen to run this 6.5 Creedmoor versus 270 Winchester correlation. I’m not doing this since I loathe either round. I do this is on the grounds that such countless shooters/trackers appear to be naive confounded about the “long-range” 6.5 Creedmoor. It’s a fine little cartridge, yet it’s being made a huge deal about all gratitude to the hot air whooshing around it. We should check whether we can present to it somewhat nearer to earth.
Despite the fact that the 270 Winchester is a dottering, old pile of a cartridge that has been limping about the world’s hunting fields for a long time, it remains fairly equipped for tipping over a rabbit, maybe a coyote, and possibly something a touch bigger and more delectable. A couple of trackers have been supposed to have killed elk with it, yet we should not lose track of the main issue at hand…
Splatterburst Targets Inc
Purchase on Amazon
Creedmoor Versus 270 Ain’t Apples to Oranges
Purchase on Amazon
Perusers at times blame me for contrasting one type with a totally different type with these ballistic juxtapositions, however this one appears to be pretty genuinely adjusted. Hell, there is just a 0.013″ distinction in shot widths between the 6.5 Creedmoor (.264″) and 270 Winchester(.277″.) Try holding your thumb and pointer tips 0.013″ separated and you’ll see the value in the enormous benefit in injury opening breadth the .277 projectile appreciates. (Piece of mockery there.) In industrial facility ammunition, the 6.5 Creedmoor is generally combined with projectiles weighing from 125-to 147-grains. The 270 ordinarily comes in 130-to 150-grain sizes. Since the heaviest 6.5 Creedmoor shots appear to be the most famous and deal the long reach execution most shooters need, we’ll shelter the weighty side.